Tuesday, April 2, 2019

The Psychology Underlying The Narrative Strategy English Literature Essay

The psychological science Underlying The Narrative Strategy English literature EssayRobert Louis Stevensons saucy The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is a great congresswoman of how different disciplines of education are intertwined. Although this novel is used in many a(prenominal) English courses, it could also be used in a Psychology course more specifically, an Abnormal Psychology course. On the surface, Dr. Jekyll is clearly paroxysm from dissociative identity disorder, more commonly kn cause as a split nature. He alternates between the personalities of himself and his evil half, Mr. Hyde however, below the surface in that respect is another fashion this novel relates to Psychology. Dr. Sigmund Freud, a very notorious psychologist from the strait-laced Era from which this novel is written, proposed a theory called Psychoanalytic Theory. This theory suggests the picture that the unconscious mind mind is split into leash dimensions the ego, the id, and the su perego. Each of these dimensions represents peerless of the main characters in this novel. The narrative strategy in The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is effective because it offers the perspectives of the three main characters, Dr. Hastie Lanyon, Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde, and Mr. Gabriel Utterson, which stimulates all parts of the unconscious making the novel sympathetic to all types of people.Dr. Hastie Lanyon represents the ego of the story which Freud describes as the decision-making component of personality that operates fit in to the reality tenet (McCann, and Weiten 523). Lanyon is very much a realist. He speaks dismissively of Dr. Jekylls experiments describing them asunscientific balderdash (Stevenson, 38). Lanyons dominant ego also makes him very skeptical. An authority that shows this characteristic is when he is following instructions to gather the contents of Dr. Jekylls drawer. Upon determination the contents, Dr. Lanyon says, Here were a phial of or so tin cture, a paper of some salt, and the record of a series of experiments that had led (like too many of Jekylls investigations) to no annul of practical usefulness (Stevenson, 73). Dr. Lanyon seriously doubts the value of the work of his originator colleague, Dr. Jekyll. His letter which shows his point of view of the events involving Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde shows the cynical side of the story which stimulates the readers own ego by allowing them to question the plausibility of the events that occur in this privy novel.Dr. Jekylls alternate personality, Hyde, represents the id, which according to Freud, is the primitive, instinctive component that operates according to the pleasure principle (McCann, and Weiten 523). Hyde is described as a troglodyte. This is basically defined as a primitive or caveman-like creature. Hyde is described as a short and obscene man that repulses eitherone that crosses his path. The id throw out also be thought of as the dickens on your shoulder that gi ves bad advice just to satisfy the here and presently instincts of the unconscious. Evil is al authoritys described as inferior to good and the way Dr. Jekylls clothes are too big for Hyde correlates with this outlook. The id has a very regent(postnominal) negative influence over the unconscious creative thinker just as Hyde is very negatively influential over Dr. Jekylls personality. According to Freud there is always an internal conflict going on inside the unconscious sectors of the mind between the evil id and the good ego. An example of how this conflict arises in the novel is when Hyde murders Sir Danvers Carew. This shows how the id, Hyde, overpowers the ego-like, or good, Mr. Carew for no obvious reason other than it was something to do that would cheer him at that very moment. The perspective of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde presented through the letter at the end of the novel shows the reader how the id can sometimes overpower the rest of the unconscious and can also counte r the attitude of the ego or Dr. Lanyon, so stimulating the readers id.Mr. Gabriel Utterson represents the last component of the unconscious, the superego. Freud describes this this part as, the moral component of personality that incorporates social standards about what represents right and wrong (McCann, and Weiten 523). The superego acts as a intermediary between the instinctive urges of the id and the realistic impulses of the ego. Mr. Utterson represents a perfect Victorian gentleman. He is polite and follows societys norms but his persistent investigations show that he cannot ignore the incident that something unnatural is going on with his friend, Dr. Jekyll. Although the three main characters were once dress hat friends, after Dr. Lanyon decided that Dr. Jekylls experiments were too peculiar and later declaring to Mr. Utterson, Jekyll became too imaginary for me. He began to go wrong, wrong in mind (Stevenson, 38), Mr. Utterson became a common friend or the mediator be tween the other two gentlemen. The way the novel is structured, having Mr. Uttersons perspective contribute to the bulk of it, is effective because it is a midway point for the reader. It allows the readers own superego to mediate the events that occur regarding Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.It is interesting to see what can be uncovered when different areas of education are applied to one another. Through the research of Dr. Sigmund Freud, one is able to relate the psychology of the unconscious mind to the behaviour, motives, and opinions of the characters Dr. Lanyon, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, and Mr. Utterson in Robert Louis Stevensons novel The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. This novel is queer because the author chose a creative way to narrate so that every person that reads the novel, no matter if they are dominated by their unconscious ego, id, or superego, they will be able to relate to at to the lowest degree one of the main characters. The narration technique of this n ovel is significant because it stimulates from severally one region of the unconscious mind and allows the reader to separately evaluate the views of each of the three main characters which, in turn, eliminates bias.

No comments:

Post a Comment